PDA

View Full Version : Boil in Oil $$$



AmandaSon
10-18-2015,
By Tim O’Shei

HOUSTON BUSINESS JOURNAL | Friday, Apr 8th 2011

Who controls the global oil prices?

Powerful banks? Massive hedge funds? Big Oil? OPEC?

There’s never been a straight answer to that question – until now.

Leah McGrath Goodman, a former special writer and editor for The Wall Street Journal and 1998 graduate of St. Bonaventure University, spent the last seven years writing a book that reveals where oil prices have been set for decades: the New York Mercantile Exchange. Or, as the title of Goodman’s book calls it, “The Asylum.”

Published this year by William Morrow/HarperCollins, “The Asylum” takes readers into the boardroom and onto the trading floor of Nymex. Goodman paints a warts-and-all portrait of the often rough-edged traders, for whom she claims making or losing millions in a day was as commonplace as fistfights, drugs and pornography.

By executing both their own deals for oil contracts and orders from big banks and hedge funds, the Nymex traders set the benchmark for global oil pricing. They still do, though Nymex is now part of a group that includes its former competitor, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and most of the trading action happens online rather than on the floor.

Business First Managing Editor Tim O’Shei, a classmate of Goodman’s at St. Bonaventure, recently talked to her about the book and about the oil market. Following is a truncated version of that conversation:

What’s your overall take on Wall Street and the oil market’s effect on the country today?

Goodman: The underlying problem in the oil market and in the broader market in this country is that ordinary Americans are now seen as a resource to be exploited by those who are in power – the wealthy and those with political influence. We’re seeing Washington and Wall Street working so closely together that you really can’t tell the difference between them anymore. The figureheads of each like to go back and forth between both locations, picking jobs, then switching and going back again. The government officials we are trusting and paying to look out for Americans are using those positions to get really nice, high-paying jobs in private-sector places, including Wall Street, that are effectively being used as bribes. It’s a problem, and it is obvious that it’s a threat to the long-term prosperity of this nation.

Let me put it this way: If you can imagine a country where the rich and the influential have managed to take over pretty much every last power center, can you imagine a situation different than the one we see here in the U.S. today?

The Asylum has several examples of that, but what really stuck in my mind were some of the crazy things – the drugs, sex, gambling – that you describe happening on and near the Nymex trading floor. The charges are explosive. What kind of reaction have you been getting?

Goodman: There has been no denying of how bad things are in terms of the traders and their behavior. There has been a lot of incredulity over who controls the market for oil itself. I saw someone wrote on the Amazon page that Nymex wasn’t really the market that calls the shots on oil, anyway, that everyone knows oil prices are controlled by OPEC and the banks and the oil companies and the hedge funds. These guys just pushed the orders through and had no idea what was going on. While it’s true that banks, oil companies and hedge funds now dominate the market, the Nymex traders handled almost all the orders and traded right alongside them, generating huge volumes. The idea that they had no idea what was afoot is a perception a lot of people have been enjoying putting out there. Because if you’re going to accept that these people were running the show, then you have to have a conversation about how we can have politicians and important, key figures in the city of New York visit this trading floor, and nobody ever said, “Maybe we shouldn’t have people doing drugs and bringing strippers and drinking alcohol while trading the benchmark global oil contract.” People would actually have to assume responsibility for what took place. And that’s out of the question. It’s more, “Oh, they weren’t running it anyway.” But they were running it.

I can see where people get confused. The long-held belief is that oil and gas prices are controlled by Big Oil, OPEC, banks and hedge funds and the like. But you make it pretty clear that the traders, who were executing the deals for big clients, could also make their own bets on the floor – and time them around massive trades from big players.

Goodman: At the end of the day, it was the traders in the pit who decided how everything was going to go down. My book tells what, exactly, took place behind closed doors in the traders’ own words, as Americans struggled to come to grips with rising oil and gas prices. It is all true. The traders talk openly about how they could arrange things around [big trader orders] so they could benefit. That happened frequently. The traders would take big orders from big players and get the best of them as a way to profit.

What kinds of reactions have you gotten from people you wrote about in the book?

Goodman: When you’re a trader who works in a place for decades where the inconceivable and outrageous is commonplace – and there is no one to tell it to who will believe you – there is a need by those subjected to the situation to talk about it in an almost confessional way. For many of the traders, market executives and government officials featured in the book, the telling of their personal stories was a cathartic experience. Some of them made huge fortunes while others were treated horribly. And the reasons for their respective fates didn’t always have much to do with whether or not they truly deserved them. Interviewing these people could be an emotional experience, for me and for them. It is no small thing to look someone in the eye, hear their story in their words and then go home, sit at your desk and render it as best you can. There is a lot of agonizing over the details and last-minute meetings and phone calls. You do not necessarily have an attachment to the person you are writing about – although you often do – but you feel a strong affinity for and loyalty to the integrity of his or her story. That said, the reactions have been a real mixed bag. Interestingly, I have heard from traders from the New York Stock Exchange and the American Stock Exchange who have told me, “This could have been a book about what we did in the stock market.” I’m not sure if that’s supposed to be reassuring, but it says a lot about the New York attitude toward running the markets. I have noticed the Amazon page for my book is essentially a lot of arguing among the readers and the oil traders. Some of it looks just terrible, but clearly this is an emotional subject for many. Some traders have called me to unload vitriol, while others have called to express their thanks. One pit trader wrote to me: “At last, someone who is not afraid to tell the truth.” Another trader, who I won’t name, rang me up throughout the entire writing of the book saying things like, “Am I going to have to wring your neck like a chicken?” I have fielded no few physical and legal threats. Thankfully, I live in a private, gated compound that is known for its surveillance and pit bulls.

Most trading now happens online. Can traders still time their trades in a way that benefits them personally?

Goodman: Can a trader still do that? Absolutely. It’s not considered to be legal within the rules of the market. If you’re caught doing things like that, you can be punished. The problem is technology has been moving so quickly – trading can be done now in milliseconds – that it’s pretty hard to catch people doing something.

If Washington were inclined to do something, what could be done?

Goodman: If members of Congress were of the mind to do something – and they’re not – they already know precisely what they can do. Traders are allowed to make very large bets with almost no money down. Right now in the oil market, for example, you can put about 5 to 10 percent down on a billion-dollar trade, which is going to have a huge effect on the price, and this is already a very fragile market. If there was a rule that said you have to put 30 or 40 percent down to do a trade, traders would think a lot harder before jumping in. The market would automatically reign itself in. People don’t like to put cash down for anything.

Wall Street has made it clear to Congress that having to put more money down to do trading is considered the nuclear option. That’s why it hasn’t happened yet.

What effect will the nuclear issue in Japan have on oil prices?

Goodman: All of these things are bad in terms of lessening our dependence on oil. As a child, I remember Chernobyl. I remember how that felt – this horrible dread toward the entire subject, and that never quite went away. This country has had a real aversion toward dipping our toe into the nuclear power pool, whereas France has given it a central role in its energy portfolio. Japan will only re-trigger all those fears about nuclear power that have been dormant in us for the past two decades. I don’t think that’s going to be good for nuclear development in this country, which means we’re going to need other things to offset it.

alisavb69
10-18-2015,
Thanks for sharing.

I've been saying the same thing for years on these very forums. The driver of ever increasing commodity costs, or specifically the volatility, is not so much emerging markets as the popular media wants you to believe, but instead it is leverage.

Wall St is addicted to leverage like it's crack cocaine. One need look no further than the record correlation in the equities market over the last couple years as Wall St tries to recapitalize after losing its shirt in 2008-09. Stocks no longer trade as representatives of individual companies. Instead stocks trade in baskets as representatives of an asset class. This is because the big boys, the hedge funds, the high frequency trading outfits, and Goldman and JPMorgan are trading equity index futures because of the leverage it allows them. Buying index futures is akin to buying proportionate shares in the underlying stocks which in turn explains the record correlation among individual stocks.

Problem is, before Wall St started almost exclusively using index futures for their equity trades they first feasted their eyes on commodity futures where a 100K dollar contract for crude oil can be purchased for less than 5,000 dollars (over 20:1 leverage). Crude oil is simply the vehicle of choice for the speculators because of the BRIC story being peddled to the public but this speculation and leverage has driven up the cost of everything from corn and wheat to lean hogs and soy beans.

The common denominator in all of these markets is leverage. Wall St loves its leverage. Buying a single stock or a handful of stocks with cash and buying and holding is a fools game for the common folk like you and me. We exist only to be fleeced in their eyes. These vultures are not investors but instead they are manipulators looking to scam the public in inelastic assets.

AlfredBete
10-18-2015,
ascinating discussion here. I think I also agree that commodities should not be leveraged simply because these are everyday consumables. If speculators artificially drive up prices, then this just hurts the average consumer for no good reason.

Keep the leverage to stocks, derivatives, forex, etc., and out of items whose price can directly affect the economy. I don't know about you, but I'm tired paying the kind of prices were are at the pump, and the last thing we need if for foodstuff to become too expensive to purchase.

AndrewOl
10-18-2015,
Here's a Bloomberg article regarding the oil situation with Iran that details how China is definitely not our friend. I, for one, sure wish our politicians would recognize this. Or, maybe they do but they're so dependent on them to buy our debt for pork stimulus bills and entitlement spending on Social Security and Medicare that there's nothing we can do about it.


Bloomberg News said:
By Indira A.R. Lakshmanan and Gopal Ratnam
Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) -- China stands to be the biggest beneficiary of U.S. and European plans for sanctions on Iran’s oil sales in an effort to pressure the regime to abandon its nuclear program.
As European Union members negotiate an Iranian oil embargo and the U.S. begins work on imposing sanctions to complicate global payments for Iranian oil, Chinese refiners already may be taking advantage of the mounting pressure. China is demanding discounts and better terms on Iranian crude, oil analysts and sanctions advocates said in interviews.
“The sanctions against Iran strengthen the Chinese hand at the negotiating table,” Michael Wittner, head of oil-market research for Societe Generale SA in New York, said in a phone interview. Chinese refiners are likely to win discounts on Iranian crude contracts as buyers from other nations halt or reduce their purchases of Iranian oil to

Annaea
10-19-2015,
he following Reuters article discusses the USA's attempt to send a message to Beijing regarding their reluctance to agree to the Iran oil sanctions. The US has placed sanctions on a small Chinese energy trading firm. In typical fashion our politicians pick on the little guy first rather than doing something meaningful.

Just a word of caution: While the article contains a quote from a political analyst at the Heritage Foundation stating they don't think the USA wishes to place sanctions CNPC or Sinopec but be advised of the potential risk this situation escalates and that these two large firms get caught in the crossfire in the event you are a shareholder of either of them.

http://news.yahoo.com/iran-sanctions-law-lets-obama-pull-punches-161350226.html

On a related note, both of these Chinese companies and others not mentioned in the article have been acquiring properties in the USA to take advantage of our oil and gas resources and to also acquire the fracking/horizontal drilling technology. I wonder if the USA has the balls to block any future acquisitions over this sanction quabble and whether they possess the international trade authority to unwind past acquisitions. That might be one hell of a threat which would raise to eyebrows in Beijing.