Thread: GS finally got caught!

Results 1 to 5 of 5

  1. 07-01-2017, #1
    AbbaLebene
    Guest

    Default GS finally got caught!

    Everybody knows that they've participated in shady activity to make profits, and this is finally something that we can prove.
    This makes me happy!


    Basically it sounds like John Paulson (Paulson & Co) created a fund full of Mortgage Backed Securities for Goldman Sacs and then shorted their own fund before the downturn in. Now their being investigated for fraud.

    Implications --
    I think that A. This could be the beginning of a snowball effect of further investigations of further companies

    B. MBS insurers and some other mislead financial institutions may have some debt reduced because of the fraudulent activity... after suites.

    and
    C. the persons who bought the securities will also come forward with suites of their own.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 07-04-2017, #2
    8wFYB0X6mD
    Guest

    Default

    I think the meaning of this fraud is that this is the first of possibly many more SEC fraud investigations.

    Hopefully Moodys and S&P will also be charged with fraud. Triple A rating on everything!!! :dong:

    This should lead to that long long long awaited pullback, though it still might only be a 3-5% of a pullback.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 07-04-2017, #3
    aavazaawjos
    Join Date Jun 2014
    Location Bermuda
    Posts 0

    Default

    WASHINGTON (AP) -- The government has accused Goldman Sachs & Co. of defrauding investors by failing to disclose conflicts of interest in mortgage investments it sold as the housing market was faltering.

    The Securities and Exchange Commission said in a civil complaint Friday that Goldman failed to disclose that one of its clients helped create -- and then bet against -- subprime mortgage securities that Goldman sold to investors.

    Investors in the mortgage securities lost more than $1 billion, the SEC said. The agency is seeking to recoup profits reaped on the deal.

    Goldman Sachs denied the allegations. In a statement, it called the SEC's charges "completely unfounded in law and fact" and said it will contest them.

    The charges come as lawmakers seek to crack down on Wall Street practices that helped cause the financial crisis. Among proposals Congress is weighing are tougher rules for complex investments like those involved in the alleged Goldman fraud.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 07-04-2017, #4
    A45T
    Join Date Oct 2014
    Posts 0

    Default

    The Goldman client implicated in the fraud is one of the world's largest hedge funds, Paulson & Co., which paid Goldman roughly $15 million for structuring the deals in 2007.

    Goldman Sachs shares fell more than 13 percent after the SEC announcement, which also caused shares of other financial companies to sink. The Dow Jones industrial average fell more than 140 points in midday trading.

    The civil lawsuit filed by the SEC in federal court in Manhattan was the government's most significant legal action related to the mortgage meltdown that ignited the financial crisis and helped plunge the country into recession. The SEC's enforcement chief said the agency is investigating a broad range of practices related to the crisis.

    The agency also charged a Goldman vice president, Fabrice Tourre, 31, who it said was principally responsible for devising the deal and marketing the securities.

    The SEC is seeking unspecified fines and restitution from Goldman Sachs and Tourre.

    Asked why the SEC did not also pursue a case against Paulson, Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami said: "It was Goldman that made the representations to investors. Paulson did not."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 07-06-2017, #5
    1SNl47gxHs
    Guest

    Default

    Goldman told investors that a third party, ACA Management LLC, had selected the underlying mortgages in the investment. But, the SEC alleges, Goldman misled investors by failing to disclose that Paulson & Co. also played a role in selecting the mortgages and stood to profit from their decline in value.

    "Goldman wrongly permitted a client that was betting against the mortgage market to heavily influence which mortgage securities to include in an investment portfolio, while telling other investors that the securities were selected by an independent, objective third party," Khuzami said in a statement.

    The SEC charges come after Goldman Sachs denied last week it bet against clients by selling them mortgage-backed securities while reducing its own exposure to them.

    In an annual letter to shareholders, Goldman said it began reducing its exposure to the U.S. mortgage market in late 2006. It said it did so by selling mortgage investments or buying credit default swaps. The swaps are a form of insurance that pays out if the value of the underlying asset declines.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules